22 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
22 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
The under_world maps are somewhat analogous. At current time, it
|
|
is but a small selection, but as time passes, a bit of an underworld
|
|
could exist, interconnected with each other. For that reason, they
|
|
should follow a layout/naming conventions somewhat similiar to that
|
|
of the above world, simply so that interconnects make sense. If
|
|
things are named like 'cave1' 'tunnel16', etc, there is no clear idea
|
|
if a cave/tunnel you are making should connect in any way with those.
|
|
|
|
Note that the naming here is a bit looser - it is quite so critical
|
|
that everything matches up perfectly as on the surface world - this
|
|
is largely because the underworld will have fewer interconnections,
|
|
and don't really need to use the map tiling as heavily as the surface
|
|
world - they may not need to use map tiling at all, and rather have
|
|
staircases or other map changers to lead from one area to the next.
|
|
|
|
For now, for the one I have done, I named it for the map it is mostly on -
|
|
the passage does in fact span two maps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Wedel
|
|
Sept 2002.
|